How Systemic Inequality Shapes Global Civic Engagement

Author: Denise Kamgaing

When public health crises like the man-made water emergency in Flint, Michigan, which

disproportionately devastated a low-income, majority-Black community, coincide with racial

disparities, such as mortality rates among Black residents in Orleans Parish post-Hurricane

Katrina soaring 1.7 to 4 times higher than those of white residents, public faith in institutions

naturally starts to decrease. The recent Harvard Youth Poll statistics reveal a widespread crisis of

trust among American youth in the U.S. government, highlighting a cycle of systemic inequality

in the United States that hurts civil society.

In a perfect democracy, the government works for the people and is elected by the people.

Citizens vote for candidates who align with what they want to improve in their community,

trusting that representatives are working toward those goals. Unfortunately, politicians

sometimes have different agendas. In "Return of the Citizen," Will Kymlicka and Wayne

Norman state that “citizens may use their power irresponsibly by pushing for benefits and

entitlements they cannot ultimately afford, or by voting themselves tax breaks and slashing

assistance to the needy,” ultimately abusing their power. When voting citizens witness this abuse

of power, it is discouraging. That dynamic drives the lowered trust in government shown in the

Harvard poll, alongside a decline in civic participation.

This issue extends beyond the United States; many countries experience deep distrust in their

government. Cameroon, for example, is a democratic state on paper that holds recurring

elections, yet it has had the same president, Paul Biya, for over forty years and only two

presidents in total since gaining independence in 1960. During elections, citizens face bribery or

threats at the polls, leading many to avoid voting because they expect their ballots will not

change anything. These citizens want better governance, but when they vote and see no change

for years, it results in a less involved civil society.

A systemic history of inequality heavily influences an individual's efforts to engage in civil

society. When communities observe incidents such as the Flint water crisis or Orleans Parish's

mortality disparities time and time again, the reality is discouraging. Citizens do want to change

and often go out to vote, but their daily lives remain in the hands of the people in power.

For Model United Nations (MUN) delegates particularly those addressing Sustainable

Development Goal 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), this dynamic is critical.

International resolutions and policy frameworks rely on domestic institutions to execute them.

When populations lose trust in their institutions due to systemic neglect or electoral corruption,

policy implementation fails on the ground. Understanding that civic disengagement stems from

structural failures rather than voter apathy allow delegates to draft realistic mechanisms for

institutional accountability and civil society oversight.

References:

Brunkard, Joan, Gena Namulanda, and Raoult Ratard. 2008. "Hurricane Katrina Deaths,

Louisiana, 2005." Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 2, no. 4: 215–23.

https://doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e31818aaf55.

Harvard Institute of Politics. 2025. The Harvard Youth Poll: 51st Edition (Fall 2025).

Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School. https://iop.harvard.edu/youth-poll/51st-

edition-fall-2025.

Kilpatrick, S. K., K. W. Bauer, N. Heard-Garris, A. M. Malone, C. M. Abdou, H. M. Weeks, M.

Clayson, K. L. Allgood, D. Dokshina, and B. L. Needham. 2023. "Experiences of the

Flint Water Crisis Among Reproductive-Age Michigan Women in Communities Outside

of Flint: Differences by Race and Ethnicity." Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health

Disparities 10, no. 3: 993–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-022-01287-6.

Kymlicka, Will, and Wayne Norman. 1994. "Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on

Citizenship Theory." Ethics 104, no. 2: 352–81

Previous
Previous

Peacekeeping and America

Next
Next

The Impermeable Five: An Examination of Structural Criticisms of the United Nations